Would David Alkire Smith Stalk Linda Compora?

Would David Alkire Smith Stalk Linda Compora?

Rest assured that I David Alkire Smith being of sound mind and infirm body would not stalk Linda Compora or any person of like demeanor even if I did not have a good Christian wife at home. This is a matter of decent taste and economy of time not to stalk anyone who you wish nothing to do with or have nothing in common with on a personal, intellectual, or political basis.

Mayor, Brian put something nasty about my lawsuit settlement with IKO on a BLOG...

(Is this essential council business?)

Linda joins a vocal audience while a speaker complains that industry and good paying jobs may come to Monroe.

(Another IKO?)

Unspeakable things...

Starting at line 2 page 8 Mary Lanham starts testimony after complaining to Judge of a neck disorder (line 22) and nervousness masking her uncomfortable. She admitted (page 13 line 24) that the city attorney told her I was within my rights but appears to still hold the opinion that no one had a right to upset Compora.

Attorney Lambrix had Ms. Lanham read aloud Section 216.02Cc of the City of Monroe Codified ordnances (page 14 line 22) permitting exactly the type of recording and photography in question. The court ruled that Ms. Lanham could not be expected to interpret the law. Ms. Lanham said that she in essence saw the camera as a form of harassment and that a camera would make her nervous and feel harassed. Note: The entire meeting including the complaint by Ms. Lanham was taped and played many times over public access TV.

Why did Compora have the Lanham Family testify? It made no sense except as a tactic to delay setting the PPO aside and increase court time and my expenses. Mary Lanham asked to read aloud the same test the city attorney read to her in the council meeting. This is an expensive civic lesson taking up court time with information she could get from many sources.

Body Snatchingr Pod from 1956 B grade Movie Classic

Page 17 line 5 Charles Lanham is sworn in. Mr Lanham said I had camera and "pod" and spoke to chief of police. Was he alluding to a seed pod, like the ones depicted in “The invasion of the Body Snatchers”? At line 22 page 25 Charles Lanham is excused after another lesson in the open meetings act etc. Where did the schools fail Mr. Lanham in civics?

Compora testified in what I believe a disjointed manner stating untrue items as facts. She made it clear that her purpose is to have references to her political behaviour and sinage removed form the internet. The Judge did not agree to order that stating that he doubed I would give up my right to post photos and opine on my web site.

Compors's testimony was more about a litany of woe and part rant rather than a foundation or basis for obtaining the PPO.

At a subsequent hearing Compora had council with her and her council offered a solution to set aside the PPO immediately while maintaining a mutual restraining order through the end of the year.

NOTE: The above is my opinion of what the attached court transcripts mean. The reader is invited to download and read them for themselves and decide if Compora is correct or incorrect in her actions. Likewise they can conclude if I was within my rights.

I asked in a nice way...

PPO Hearing Transcript of March 15, 2007—6,251 KB PDF

PPO Hearing Transcript of April 19, 2007—7,897 KB PDF

Click Here To Send E-Mail To Web Keeper David Alkire Smith - all comments are welcome

Home